The U.S. Supreme Court has authorized the Trump administration to move forward with deporting eight immigrants currently detained at a U.S. military base in Djibouti to South Sudan. The brief, unsigned order reinstates an earlier stay of a lower court’s ruling, effectively allowing the deportations to proceed while litigation continues.

The dispute originated from U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy’s decision in Massachusetts, which barred the government from deporting individuals to “third countries” not specified in their removal orders without first confirming they would not face torture. His ruling halted the deportation of eight men from Cuba, Vietnam, and Laos, whose flight was diverted midair to Djibouti after his injunction took effect.

Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued before the Court that Murphy’s order obstructed federal immigration enforcement and interfered with foreign policy and national security. The Supreme Court’s conservative majority sided with the administration, concluding that Murphy’s injunction violated the earlier stay. Justice Elena Kagan concurred with the result, emphasizing that lower courts must follow the Supreme Court’s prior orders, while Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, warning that the decision could endanger the men by sending them to a violent, unstable nation.

The ruling underscores a tense intersection between immigration law, executive power, and humanitarian concerns. As legal challenges continue, the fate of the eight detainees remains uncertain — a stark reminder of how policy decisions at the highest levels can deeply affect lives caught between borders.