The world woke to shock when Donald Trump announced that the United States had bombed three Iranian nuclear sites. With a single post, he claimed a “very successful attack,” instantly jolting global politics and pushing tensions to the brink. Allies scrambled for clarity. Adversaries braced for consequences. The sense of stability vanished overnight.

By explicitly naming Fordo, one of Iran’s most fortified nuclear installations, Trump signaled a strike at the core of Tehran’s nuclear program. Israeli leaders hailed the move as historic, while European governments rushed into emergency consultations, alarmed by the speed and scale of escalation.

In Tehran, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi condemned the strikes as “outrageous” and “criminal,” invoking Iran’s right under the UN Charter to defend itself. His warning that Iran “reserves all options” echoed across state media—a phrase widely understood as a promise of retaliation.

As markets tremble and diplomats race behind closed doors, the world is suspended in uncertainty. Whether this moment hardens into deterrence or ignites a broader conflict remains unknown. What is clear is that the next decision—by any side—could determine whether this crisis stops here or spirals far beyond control.